New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy filed a federal lawsuit Friday to block a contentious plan to impose the nation’s first congestion pricing toll system on some of Manhattan’s busiest streets.

The Garden State governor’s suit in New Jersey federal court claims the US Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration didn’t conduct a proper review of the toll’s impact on New Jersey drivers — claiming they’d be unfairly targeted.

The Garden State governor filed suit in New Jersey federal court against the US Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration claiming the agencies didn’t conduct a proper review of what the impacts of the tolls would be on New Jerseyans — who he claims would be unfairly targeted by the plan.

“After refusing to conduct a full environmental review of the [Metropolitan Transit Authority’s] poorly designed tolling program, the FHWA has unlawfully fast-tracked the agency’s attempt to line its own coffers at the expense of New Jersey families,” Murphy said in a statement.

“The costs of standing idly by while the MTA uses New Jersey residents to help balance its budget sheets are more than economic.”

The FHWA made the “decision to rubber-stamp” the review process that “inexplicably” found there would be “no significant impact on the human or natural environment,” the suit charges.

The feds allowed the MTA to carry out an expedited environmental review in March 2021 — which still took two years and produced a 4,800-page report.

NJ Gov. Phil Murphy Friday filed suit to block the congestion pricing tolls in Manhattan.

The review found the tolls imposed on streets south of 60th Street in Manhattan could reduce car traffic in the so-called central financial district by as much as 60%, though would likely result in more traffic in the outer boroughs and New Jersey.

According to the governor’s filing, the new toll system will divert traffic from Manhattan’s busy district and move it to New Jersey — which will not only bear the financial burden but increased pollution that’ll harm the environment and residents, especially in Bergen County, NJ.

And through the plan — figured to raise revenues for the MTA by $15 billion — is allotting $130 million to help mitigate the air quality impact on New York areas, it doesn’t set aside any money to help mitigate the potential impact on New Jersey, the suit alleges.

Traffic on the way to the Holland Tunnel is pictured
Murphy claims the plan unfairly penalizes New Jersey residents.

“There will be dramatic shifts in traffic patterns affecting hundreds of thousands of vehicles, as well as mass transit, throughout New Jersey. It is undeniable that the proposed action will cause significant environmental impacts on the region and beyond,” the court papers claim.

Murphy is asking a judge to issue injunctions invalidating the environmental impact reviews that were done — and force the agencies “to complete a full and proper” review of the impacts.

A spokesperson with the Federal Highway Administration said the agency “does not comment on pending litigation.”

NJ Gov. Phil Murphy is pictured
Murphy argues a proper environmental review of the consequences on the Garden State wasn’t undertaken.

Murphy lawyered up last month with pit bull attorneys Randy Mastro and Craig Capenito as he prepared to bring the lawsuit.

The governor has been a staunch opponent of the proposal — and even launching an ad campaign in May to try to lure New Yorkers to move to New Jersey in protest of the congestion pricing.

The MTA hasn’t set the price yet for what the toll will be — which was slated to go into effect as early as next spring. But it has said it could range from $9 to $23 per day to drive a car in the targeted central business district.

Source link